Abstract of my last seminar

Percieved restorativeness and place attachment:(How) are they related?（ <---跟瑋佳學姐一樣深愛這個句型）

Researchers of environmental psychology have often suggested that people gain benefits from natural environments, most studies have focused up either ART or people's involvement to settings such as place attachment theory. This study try to fill the gap in the literature between them by investigating the experiences of on-site and experimental samples that shaping their cognition of the settings. This study investigated 3 different natural settings, 231 experimental and 675 on-site samples were collected. Participants also rated their perceived level of naturalness and preference of the setting. In this study the author also tried to test the mediating role of place attachment in environmental restorative potential. The results indicate that legibility holds lower inner consistency in experimental samples, both samples recognize the more natural environments to be more attached and higher percieved retorativeness. Mediating role of place attachment will be further disscussed. Together, these results help substantiate the adaptive function of people’s environmental preferences.

面對 Data

我有一股蠻勁，傻傻的，只怕作的不夠多不夠完整。所以在有限的時間內衝資料收集，也衝到了近一千份，感謝學弟妹的幫忙，真是團結力量大啊。

刪的刪，淘汰的淘汰了之後，剩下了907位受測者資料。

907位的資料，整整4頁的問項，包含ART、Place attachment、自然度、態度、還有天真無邪時發展的農業休閒體驗問卷。天啊，我真是傻眼了，要怎麼整理呢？
回想以前作的計畫，收的DATA也都不少，但這次對我來說意義特別不一樣，加了很多自己想瞭解的變項下去，DATA海一眼望去就是特別迷人，特別有一種--我要把你們的每一個價值用到淋漓盡致的好高騖遠感。

單是輸入DATA就陸陸續續花了將近一個月的時間，接下來的檢查DATA也花了近一個禮拜。好，檢查過了，安心了八成。接下來？

幫助理解DATA合不合理有沒有問題...
1.次數分配：男女的數值裡面有5是怎麼回事？對照編號回去翻問卷修改，搞定，安心。年齡聽說小於12歲應該排除，沒問題，這一刪也去了3個。有幾個問項的遺漏值特別多？為什麼？值得思考，好，記錄下來慢慢想。
2.交叉表：地點、地區、樣點、性別、年齡通通輪替交叉，幫助自己回想資料收集過程怎麼分配樣本數的，單調的數據看多了也產生感情。
3.描述統計：跑一跑DATA的峰度、偏態，好，看起來也好像合理，至於到底多少是合理，我沒花時間去研究，只知道比人家示範的更理想就是了。跑一跑年齡長條圖，好像也有助於想個妥善的年齡層分塊。至此，我越來越愛上這份DATA。
4.信度：都很高啊，你們很乖。林某人我一定不辜負你們，以後就抱著你們反覆分析了，交個好友吧！

據說

每天都要寫一張，文章才能硬梆梆。